Mobile Physics as Innovation to Reinvigorating Active Engagement and Learning Dynamics of Grade 11 Learners on Uniform Accelerated Motion
Keywords:
active engagement, learning dynamics, innovation and mobile physics, uniform accelerated motionAbstract
Physics phenomena are widely viewed in daily life, and the technical nature of physics makes modern life seem to be simpler than it was many years ago. Physics teaching and learning, on the other hand, has not always been done effectively, especially in developing countries. This study aimed measured the effectiveness using mobile physics on students’ reinvigorating active engagement and learning dynamics on teaching uniform accelerated motion. The study employed the one-group pretest–posttest design. The design compared the result obtained from researcher – made - pretest and posttest and adapted science engagement scales. The study revealed that mobile physics as innovation had a positive effect on the learning dynamic of the learners, as evidenced by the significantly greater mean in the posttest. The data showed that there is significant difference in the pretest and posttest score of students in the utilization of mobile physics on teaching uniform accelerated motion. It is also evident that learners highly have engagement during the innovation on teaching uniform accelerated motion. Future utilization of this mobile physics as an innovation would raise learners’ active engagement and learning dynamics in teaching physics concepts.
Downloads
References
Alegre, H. C. (2012). Revisiting Students’ Early and Recurring Experiences and Perceptions about Physics. Philippine Physics Journal, Volume 34, pp. 1-9.
Ali, T. (2012). A Case Study of the Common Difficulties Experienced by High School Students in
Chemistry Classroom in Gilgit-Baltistan (Pakistan). SAGE Open.
Angell, C. et al (2014). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physicsteaching. Science Education, 88 (5), pp. 683-706.
Asuncion, A. J., Encina, M. J. M., Mayano-Atienza, R. J. A. (2012). Physics Works. ARMVET Printing CompanyInc.
Balichenko M. et al. (2017). Digital Learning Characteristics and Principles of Information Resources Knowledge Structuring. European Journal of Educational Research, 6 3.
Cadorna, E. et al. (2013). Mathematics Anxiety and Performance in Physics 102 of Non-Physics Students. Philippine Physics Journal, 35, pp. 24-34.
Cutnell, J. D. and Johnson, K. W. (2014). Physics, 10th edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Caudill. J., (2017). The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: Parallel developments. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8 1-13.
Alegre, H. C. (2012). Revisiting Students’ Early and Recurring Experiences and Perceptions about Physics. Philippine Physics Journal, Volume 34, pp. 1-9.
Dekhane, S. et al. (2013). Mobile app development to increase student engagement and problem-solving skill. Journal of Information Systems Education, 24(4),https://www.learntechlib.org/p/156711/
Dunn, R. (1984). Learning style: state of science. Theory into Practice, 23, pp. 10-19.
Giambattista, A., &Richardson, B. M., and Richardson, R. C. (2007). College Physics, 2nd edition. Mc Graw-Hill Education (Asia).
González, et al. (2015). Teaching and Learning Physics with Smartphones. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 17(1), 31-50.
Falcão et al. (2010). Cellular phones helping to get a clearer picture of kinematics. The Physics Teacher 47, no. 3, 167-168.
Harper, K. A. (2006). Student Problem-Solving Behaviors. The Physics Teacher. 44(4), pp. 250-251.
Keegan D. (2012). The future of learning: From eLearning to mLearning. Technical Report Fern Universität, Hagen, Germany. ISSN-1435-9340.
Kuhn J., et. al. (2012). Analyzing free fall with a smartphone acceleration sensor. The Physics Teacher 50.3.
Liu et al. (2013). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19, no. 3, 371-382.
Markett, et al. (2016). Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the classroom. Computers & Education 46 (3), 280-293.
Meyers, C. and Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning, strategies for college classroom. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Ogunleye, A. O. (2010). Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of Students’ Problem-Solving Difficulties in Physics: Implications for Remediation. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6 (7). pp. 85-90.
Okada, A., Pasternak Glitz Kowalski, R., Kirner, C., & Torres, P. L. (2018). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption of AR inquiry games to foster skills for Responsible Research and Innovation. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1473257.
Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R. and Haugan, M. P. (2010). What Makes Physics Difficult? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3 (1). pp. 30-34.
Redish, E. F. (1994). Indicators of Cognitive Studies for Teaching Physics. Am. J. Phys. 62, pp. 796-803.
Santisteban, C. J. C. (2009). C & E Publishing. Inc., Quezon City. Shake, 2016. http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/why-hard-get-students-learn-evensimple-physi-406962
Shabrina, & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Android-Assisted Mobile Physics Learning Through Indonesian Batik Culture: Improving Students’ Creative Thinking and Problem Solving. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 287-302.
Saputra, R.D., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of Physics Mobile Learning (PML) with Hombo Batu theme to Improve the Ability of Diagram Representation and Critical Thinking of Senior High School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (2). http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2019_2_30.pdf.
Tabor S, W. (2016). Making Mobile Learning Work: Student Perceptions and Implementation Factors. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 15. pp. 075-098. https://doi.org/10.28945/3524
Vavoula G., & Karagiannidis C. (2015). Designing mobile learning experiences. In Advances in Informatics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2005), pp. 534-544.
Yanga, J., & Yenb, Y. (2016). College Students‟ Perspectives of E-Learning System Use in High Education. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 2(2): 53-62. http://doi.10.20448/journal.522/2016.2.2/522.2.53.62
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
editor@ijrasb.com 